Skip to content

litd_custom_channels_test.go: Better commenting of itest cases#1004

Draft
ZZiigguurraatt wants to merge 2 commits intolightninglabs:masterfrom
ZZiigguurraatt:better-commenting-of-itest-cases
Draft

litd_custom_channels_test.go: Better commenting of itest cases#1004
ZZiigguurraatt wants to merge 2 commits intolightninglabs:masterfrom
ZZiigguurraatt:better-commenting-of-itest-cases

Conversation

@ZZiigguurraatt
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is focused on making comments surrounding itest cases easier to understand with more details and a visual of the route that the payment is expected to take.

There are a few cases that I have adjusted and would like feedback on this approach. If it is desired, I will continue to do the same thing to all test cases.

Copy link
Contributor

@guggero guggero left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you!

@levmi levmi moved this from 🆕 New to 🏗 In progress in Taproot-Assets Project Board Mar 24, 2025
@levmi levmi moved this from 🏗 In progress to 👀 In review in Taproot-Assets Project Board Mar 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: 👀 In review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants